Carr, Bernard, and George Ellis. “Universe or Multiverse?” Astronomy & Geophysics, vol. 49, no. 2, 1 Apr. 2008, doi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2008.49229.x.
[Website] Carr and Ellis write their journal “Universe or Multiverse” exploring the many speculations that pertain to the idea of having multiple universes, AKA the Multiverse. Their question is whether this is philosophy or science. They propose that there are 4 different types: quantum cosmology effects at the Planck time, the Theory of Everything, the M-theory, and the string theory. The description of these theories provide a further understanding of each of the interpretations we humans have been able to come to with some sort of evidence. It is concluded that although it is a widely growing theory, there is speculation that physicists may never be able to see other dimensions.
Davies, P. C. W. “Multiverse Cosmological Models.” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 10, 2004, pp. 727–743., doi:10.1142/s021773230401357x.
[Journal Article] Davies wrote in “Multiverse Cosmological Models” about the recent advances from researchers in the string theory and inflationary cosmology that have led to the idea of the possible existence of a multiverse. Their hypothesis was that “in an infinite universe there will always be astronomically large regions somewhere which…exhibit sufficient departure from equilibrium to support the emergence of biological organisms.” In other words, as large as the universe is as we know it, there is a significant chance there is a point of equilibrium in another largely spread region to support life, and even human life. This article has support from credible sources such as Oxford University and Cambridge University and is able to explain complications, predictions, and a couple more possibilities for what lies in the universe/multiverse.
Siegel, Ethan. “This Is Why The Multiverse Must Exist.” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 15 Mar. 2019, www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/03/15/this-is-why-the-multiverse-must-exist/?sh=797e5a536d08.
[Online Newspaper Article] Ethan Siegel wrote in his article "This Is Why The Multiverse Must Exist" the multiverse is just the "idea that our Universe and all that's contained with it [is] just one small part of a larger structure." This article also has the ability to explain in a less advanced way than most scientific journal articles in ways people who don't take advanced physics will understand. There are even diagrams and infographics that are able to visibly explain how the theories scientifically work which are from very credible research sources like Berkley Labs. It makes the reader question whether or not the laws of physics even applies to other universes that are unknown to us.
Harris, Jeremie. “You Probably Live in a Parallel Universe. Here's Why.” Medium, The Journal Blog, 27 May 2020, blog.usejournal.com/why-do-physicists-believe-in-parallel-universes-e16aee491f42.
[Journal Blog] Jeremie Harris and his article "You Probably Live in a Parallel Universe. Here's Why" explicitly states that this explanation of the multiverse theory is 100% math-free and easier to wrap one's mind around. Harris explains the thoughts and research that Hugh Everett III (the man who introduced the idea of the multiverse) had and did, which included how we humans should not be thinking we are special,,,but instead we must "[think] of ourselves as quantum objects." Not only does Harris explain the facts of WHY this idea could exist according to many significant physicists and scientists, but he also provides some holes that even researchers still are not able to fill.
Le Roux, Mariette, and Laurence Coustal. “After Death, Hawking Cuts 'Multiverse' Theory down to Size.” Phys.org, 6 May 2018, phys.org/news/2018-05-death-hawking-multiverse-theory-size.html.
[Online News Article] Le Roux and Coustal write about Stephen Hawking and his findings on cutting down the large and vague theory of the multiverse. In his last contribution to cosmology, Hawking doesn't dismiss the idea, but was actually able to "dramatically [scale] it down." We have yet to find out the one entire unique universe, but are able to prove that there is a "much smaller range of possible universes." Stephen Hawking discovered that black holes emit radiation, which takes us back to the "theory of everything." The article explains in great detail more about Stephen Hawking's findings and how it contributes to the idea of the multiverse.
Horgan, John. “Multiverse Theories Are Bad for Science.” Scientific American Blog Network, Scientific American, 25 Nov. 2019, blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/multiverse-theories-are-bad-for-science/.
[Online Science Blog] John Horgan, American science journalist, writes in his Scientific Blog that the Multiverse theories are actually "Bad For Science" (as seen in the title of this blog). In essence, the quantum world actually IS our world. Horgan explains how '"quantum mechanics isn't just an approximation to the truth; it is the truth'" which ultimately summarizes the fact that the multiverse is "an inescapable consequence of quantum mechanics." Basically, as the universe splits or branches, there are just billions and zillions of our own doppelgängers living elsewhere. I use this source because it is an argument that not only supports MY own argument of the mere existence of the multiverse, but it also explains a bigger-picture-POV as to why the theory itself is more unscientific than anything ever tested. As much science that goes into this theory, we still have no way of testing whether or not our 100th doppelgänger is living a better life than us or not.
https://www.livescience.com/why-are-humans-curious.html
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/having-an-existential-crisis-it-could-be-worse-and-weirder/
https://www.wisdomperiodical.com/index.php/wisdom/article/view/25/37
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/are-parallel-universes-unscientific-nonsense-insider-tips-for-criticizing-the-multiverse/
https://arcdigital.media/a-multiverse-of-possibilities-204db40ddb4b
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/taming-the-multiverse-stephen-hawkings-final-theory-about-the-big-bang
[Website] Carr and Ellis write their journal “Universe or Multiverse” exploring the many speculations that pertain to the idea of having multiple universes, AKA the Multiverse. Their question is whether this is philosophy or science. They propose that there are 4 different types: quantum cosmology effects at the Planck time, the Theory of Everything, the M-theory, and the string theory. The description of these theories provide a further understanding of each of the interpretations we humans have been able to come to with some sort of evidence. It is concluded that although it is a widely growing theory, there is speculation that physicists may never be able to see other dimensions.
Davies, P. C. W. “Multiverse Cosmological Models.” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 10, 2004, pp. 727–743., doi:10.1142/s021773230401357x.
[Journal Article] Davies wrote in “Multiverse Cosmological Models” about the recent advances from researchers in the string theory and inflationary cosmology that have led to the idea of the possible existence of a multiverse. Their hypothesis was that “in an infinite universe there will always be astronomically large regions somewhere which…exhibit sufficient departure from equilibrium to support the emergence of biological organisms.” In other words, as large as the universe is as we know it, there is a significant chance there is a point of equilibrium in another largely spread region to support life, and even human life. This article has support from credible sources such as Oxford University and Cambridge University and is able to explain complications, predictions, and a couple more possibilities for what lies in the universe/multiverse.
Siegel, Ethan. “This Is Why The Multiverse Must Exist.” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 15 Mar. 2019, www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/03/15/this-is-why-the-multiverse-must-exist/?sh=797e5a536d08.
[Online Newspaper Article] Ethan Siegel wrote in his article "This Is Why The Multiverse Must Exist" the multiverse is just the "idea that our Universe and all that's contained with it [is] just one small part of a larger structure." This article also has the ability to explain in a less advanced way than most scientific journal articles in ways people who don't take advanced physics will understand. There are even diagrams and infographics that are able to visibly explain how the theories scientifically work which are from very credible research sources like Berkley Labs. It makes the reader question whether or not the laws of physics even applies to other universes that are unknown to us.
Harris, Jeremie. “You Probably Live in a Parallel Universe. Here's Why.” Medium, The Journal Blog, 27 May 2020, blog.usejournal.com/why-do-physicists-believe-in-parallel-universes-e16aee491f42.
[Journal Blog] Jeremie Harris and his article "You Probably Live in a Parallel Universe. Here's Why" explicitly states that this explanation of the multiverse theory is 100% math-free and easier to wrap one's mind around. Harris explains the thoughts and research that Hugh Everett III (the man who introduced the idea of the multiverse) had and did, which included how we humans should not be thinking we are special,,,but instead we must "[think] of ourselves as quantum objects." Not only does Harris explain the facts of WHY this idea could exist according to many significant physicists and scientists, but he also provides some holes that even researchers still are not able to fill.
Le Roux, Mariette, and Laurence Coustal. “After Death, Hawking Cuts 'Multiverse' Theory down to Size.” Phys.org, 6 May 2018, phys.org/news/2018-05-death-hawking-multiverse-theory-size.html.
[Online News Article] Le Roux and Coustal write about Stephen Hawking and his findings on cutting down the large and vague theory of the multiverse. In his last contribution to cosmology, Hawking doesn't dismiss the idea, but was actually able to "dramatically [scale] it down." We have yet to find out the one entire unique universe, but are able to prove that there is a "much smaller range of possible universes." Stephen Hawking discovered that black holes emit radiation, which takes us back to the "theory of everything." The article explains in great detail more about Stephen Hawking's findings and how it contributes to the idea of the multiverse.
Horgan, John. “Multiverse Theories Are Bad for Science.” Scientific American Blog Network, Scientific American, 25 Nov. 2019, blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/multiverse-theories-are-bad-for-science/.
[Online Science Blog] John Horgan, American science journalist, writes in his Scientific Blog that the Multiverse theories are actually "Bad For Science" (as seen in the title of this blog). In essence, the quantum world actually IS our world. Horgan explains how '"quantum mechanics isn't just an approximation to the truth; it is the truth'" which ultimately summarizes the fact that the multiverse is "an inescapable consequence of quantum mechanics." Basically, as the universe splits or branches, there are just billions and zillions of our own doppelgängers living elsewhere. I use this source because it is an argument that not only supports MY own argument of the mere existence of the multiverse, but it also explains a bigger-picture-POV as to why the theory itself is more unscientific than anything ever tested. As much science that goes into this theory, we still have no way of testing whether or not our 100th doppelgänger is living a better life than us or not.
https://www.livescience.com/why-are-humans-curious.html
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/having-an-existential-crisis-it-could-be-worse-and-weirder/
https://www.wisdomperiodical.com/index.php/wisdom/article/view/25/37
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/are-parallel-universes-unscientific-nonsense-insider-tips-for-criticizing-the-multiverse/
https://arcdigital.media/a-multiverse-of-possibilities-204db40ddb4b
https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/taming-the-multiverse-stephen-hawkings-final-theory-about-the-big-bang